After the excitement about the BoJ’s stimulus, the economy has shown virtually zero real growth. A sales tax rise in April shook the economy as people rushed to spend money before.
After the excitement about the BoJ’s stimulus, the economy has shown virtually zero real growth. A sales tax rise in April shook the economy as people rushed to spend money before.
Abenomics: Off target
by Jonathan Soble
FT.com
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/b26f3f52-2c35-11e4-8eda-00144feabdc0.html
http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/b26f3f52-2c35-11e4-8eda-00144feabdc0.html
After the excitement about the BoJ’s stimulus, the economy has shown virtually zero real growth
**
It is never a good sign for a world leader when golfing becomes an object of scandal.
As Barack Obama faces criticism in the US for playing while racial protests roil Ferguson, Missouri, and Islamist fanatics revel in the beheading of an American journalist in Syria, Shinzo Abe, his Japanese counterpart, is also under fire for golfing during a crisis.
High quality global journalism requires investment. Please share this article with others using the link below, do not cut & paste the article. See our Ts&Cs and Copyright Policy for more detail. Email ftsales.support@ft.com to buy additional rights. http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/b26f3f52-2c35-11e4-8eda-00144feabdc0.html#ixzz3Ch1QczCF
In Mr Abe’s case, the charge is that he went ahead with a game after receiving reports of landslides in Hiroshima prefecture that have killed more than 50 people amid a torrential spate of rain. Yet like the attacks on Mr Obama, the criticism – opposition parties have called for a parliamentary inquiry – feels like a symptom of deeper vulnerabilities: the once untouchably popular architect of “Abenomics” is having a humbling summer.
There are several reasons why. Mr Abe has spent political capital freely on causes that he believes are important for Japan but that are unloved by the public, such as peeling back constitutional limits on the military and restarting nuclear power plants idled after the 2011 Fukushima meltdown.
A bigger reason, though, may be dissatisfaction with Mr Abe’s economic policies – previously his greatest political asset. Even before a jarring 6.8 per cent annualised contraction in second-quarter gross domestic product was confirmed by government data this month, doubts were growing about the premier’s campaign to stimulate growth.
The normally Abe-supporting Sankei newspaper declared a “shadow” over Abenomics in July, after its pollsters found more people disapproved of the government’s handing of the economy than approved. In multiple opinion surveys, Mr Abe’s overall support stands at less than 50 per cent, down sharply from the 70-plus per cent ratings he enjoyed for most of his first year in office.
“Abenomics is in trouble,” says Robert Feldman, chief Japan economist at Morgan Stanley MUFG, who points to a loss of confidence among investors as well as the general public. Although some economic indicators have started pointing upward after the bruising second quarter, “the pace is too slow to warrant hope of a sharp rebound”, he worries.
The most commonly heard question about Abenomics used to be whether Mr Abe could carry out growth-enhancing structural reforms – the so-called third arrow of his three-point revival strategy. It still has not been answered: the record so far looks like a mix of achievements, compromises and missed opportunities. In any case, even optimists concede deregulation and other initiatives will take years to implement and even longer to have any effect on growth.
Now scepticism is being trained on what was thought to be Abenomics’ core competency: goosing the economy through fiscal and, especially, monetary stimulus.
The problem is not so much the latest GDP data – a downturn had been universally expected due to an increase in the national sales tax that took effect on April 1. And while the contraction was bigger than experts had initially predicted, so was the surge in economic activity in the quarter before the rise. Essentially, a lot of people moved their spending forward to beat the deadline.
More troubling is a broader economic picture that has some people raising concerns about stagflation. Once the tax-related GDP gyrations are averaged out, the economy experienced virtually zero real growth between mid-2013 and mid-2014. Meanwhile, aggressive monetary stimulus from the Bank of Japan has stoked inflation. Despite a slight pick-up in wages in June, a larger increase in prices meant that real incomes were 3.2 per cent below what they were a year earlier.
Even Abenomics’ sponsors admit things are not going exactly to plan. Inflation per se is not what bothers them, since escaping persistent consumer price declines was a central goal of their strategy.
But the virtuous circle of “good” inflation that they promised, with price rises feeding through to comparable increases in incomes, has looked distinctly lopsided, with a bulge on the prices side that is making people poorer.
Haruhiko Kuroda, the BoJ governor, addressed the issue at a meeting of central bankers in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, at the weekend. He called the failure of wages to be swept up in his monetary deluge “a troublesome problem” and said Japan was only “halfway” to beating deflation. But he predicted incomes would catch up once businesses and workers came to accept rising prices as Japan’s new normal.
“Once the bank has succeeded in firmly anchoring inflation expectations at 2 per cent, this could provide the basis on which wage negotiations between management and labour are conducted,” he said. On that view, Abenomics is simply passing through an awkward adolescence – but one that even Mr Kuroda conceded might persist for “some time”.
Certainly, the softness in wages looks like a mystery. Corporate profits are at record highs and Japan is in effect at full employment, with joblessness comfortably under 4 per cent – ideal conditions in which to demand higher pay. Yet while economists expect incomes to pick up, structural issues could limit how far they rise.
“Labour market dynamics appear to have changed in Japan since the current recovery began around November 2012,” says Kyohei Morita, an economist at Barclays. “In part, this is a matter of demographics.”
In short: baby boomers are retiring and taking the best-paid jobs with them. Their replacements are far more likely be part-timers, contractors or other lower-wage workers, including their own offspring. A wave of mothers born during the baby-boom “echo” is re-entering the workforce, mostly for less pay, as their youngest children reach school age.
Such shifts are creating a paradox in which the pay of those in work is rising across the economy yet average incomes are stagnant because the highest-paid jobs are disappearing.
Structural changes are impeding Abenomics elsewhere. Giving big exporters such as Toyota and Sony a competitive boost by weakening the yen used to be a reliable way to stimulate Japan’s economy, but a decline of more than 20 per cent in the currency under Mr Abe has not done the trick this time round.
That is in part because Japan became a net importer after Fukushima, owing to increased purchases of foreign oil and gas. But exports have not grown as expected either. Many believe that is because companies make more of their products outside Japan – in the case of carmakers, for instance, foreign production volume has risen by 80 per cent since the last comparable period of yen weakness almost a decade ago, while domestic output has declined.
Mr Abe must decide this year whether to go ahead with another sales tax increase in October 2015, the second of two passed into law by a previous government.
He can stop it if he deems the economy too fragile. But the combination of an expected GDP rebound in the third quarter and continued political pressure to tackle Japan’s debt – not least from the powerful finance ministry – has many betting that he will still give the green light.
In a survey published by the Nikkei business daily on Monday, just 30 per cent said the next rise should go ahead, down 6 points from last month.
The next rise is smaller – 2 percentage points against 3 percentage points in April – but the political stakes look higher: Mr Abe must face voters again by the middle of 2016.
ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/b26f3f52-2c35-11e4-8eda-00144feabdc0.html
Testing times
Important events for Mr Abe and Abenomics through the end of 2014:
September: Crucial advisers will keep their cabinet jobs but trouble could come from those who are passed over. Party discipline has been unusually strong under Mr Abe but there is a long waiting list for posts, and those who end up disappointed could feel freer to criticise the administration.
September: Tokyo and Pyongyang are negotiating the return of Japanese citizens kidnapped by North Korea in the 1970s and 80s. If a deal is struck and Mr Abe jets to Pyongyang to “bring back” Japanese abductees, his popularity could surge.
October and November: Elections will be held in the disenchanted regions of Fukushima and Okinawa. Fukushima for the disruption from the 2011 nuclear accident and Okinawa for an unpopular Abe-backed plan to relocate a US military base. Defeat of Liberal Democrat-backed candidates could be taken as a rebuke of the prime minister.
November: Mr Abe is trying to convince Xi Jinping, China’s president, to meet him on the sidelines of an Apec gathering in Beijing. Japan-China relations are at a low point over historical and territorial disputes, and a meeting – it would be their first – could defuse tensions that have hurt business as well as diplomacy.
December: A second sales tax increase, from 8 to 10 per cent, is planned for October 2015, and Mr Abe must decide this year whether to let it happen or stop it on the grounds that the economy is too fragile. Despite the disruption caused by the April rise, the betting is still that he will give the green light.
**
ft.com/cms/s/0/b26f3f52-2c35-11e4-8eda-00144feabdc0.html
Three arrows, six obstacles – Why Abenomics has run out of gas
1. A sales tax rise in April shook the economy as people rushed to spend money before it took effect. Both the pre-increase lift to GDP and the subsequent crash were bigger than the last time Japan raised the tax, in 1997. In the end, Japan’s economy in mid-2014 was barely bigger than it was a year earlier.
2. A huge ramp-up in monetary stimulus from the Bank of Japan has stoked price increases. Japan was stuck in deflation for well over a decade, so that should be good news – except that wages have not kept pace, making people poorer. There are signs that pay increases are starting to accelerate, but higher taxes make it harder to close the gap.
3. The yen’s value has fallen by about 20% under Shinzo Abe. Devaluing the yen was once a surefire way to boost Japan’s export-geared economy, but today things are different. Japan became a net importer after the Fukushima nuclear accident in 2011, owing to increased purchases of foreign oil and gas. A weaker yen has made the trade deficit bigger, not smaller.
4. A bigger import bill is not the only problem. Exports have not grown as expected in response to the yen’s decline, and some analysts think a fundamental shift in Japan’s manufacturing sector is to blame. Companies make more of their products outside Japan than they did during the last comparable period of yen weakness nearly a decade ago.
5. One problem Japanese businesses do not have is a lack of cash. Retained earnings have soared since the late 1990s to more than 60% of GDP. Convincing companies to part with that treasure in ways that would stimulate the economy – by investing it, paying workers more or handing it over to shareholders – has been a challenge.
6. The BoJ argues that deflation will not be comfortably beaten until core consumer prices are rising by about 2% annually, something it predicts will happen in the next year or so. The central bank has done a better job at lifting prices than many economists initially expected, but the market consensus is still more pessimistic.
消費税10%決定までの年内相場は、なんでもありのPKO相場が展開されそうだ
by 石原順
https://www.rakuten-sec.co.jp/web/market/opinion/fx/ishihara/0363.html?scid=me_scr_rsecnws_20140908_txt_fx_all_001
8月28日、英フィナンシャルタイムズ紙は『的を外すアベノミクス』と題して、アベノミクスを酷評した。「安倍晋三首相の3本の矢は明らかに的を外している。理由はそもそも矢が3本ないことで、あるのはたった1本、通貨の下落のみだ。安倍氏は、小泉純一郎元首相が少なくともそうあろうとした意味での真の改革者ではなかった。安倍氏は将来を見すえるよりも、過去を回顧する政治家だからだ。4番目の矢(数え方によっては2番目の矢)として軍国主義が復活しないように願いたい。安倍氏の本当の関心がそこにあるという兆候がしきりに見える」と書いているが、日本に対しては、< 追加の金融緩和、労働市場の改革、消費税増税の延期>の3つを提言した。
金融市場に大きな影響力を持つフィナンシャルタイムズに批判を受けたことで、日本の当局は焦り、黒田日銀総裁が9月1日にブルームバーグの記事で< 消費税増税の延期に対する牽制>を行った。「黒田東彦総裁は今年4月の消費増税と同様、2015年10月の2回目の消費増税についても予定通り実施することを政府に求める意向だ。同時に、増税で景気が落ち込んだ場合は日銀には対応の余地があるものの、増税先送りで財政再建に対する信認が揺らいだ場合(日本国債売りが起きた場合)はやれることはほとんどないという姿勢を堅持する見込みだ」(9月2日ブルームバーグ)
財務省にとって消費税10%は悲願であるが、海外投資家に見切りをつけられても困る。9月2日には某証券会社が「TOPIX型の裁定買い」と「日経平均先物買い」を入れたことで日経平均が大幅高したが、「消費税増税の延期を回避しようとするPKO的な動きだ」とファンドの運用者は口をそろえている。
(sk)
みんな忙しすぎて、もとの文章を読まずにコピーペーストし、それがまたコピーペーストされ、伝わっていく。伝言ゲームに多くの人が参加し、ほんとうに短い時間で、情報が歪んでしまう。
ニュースを発信する側が、地域や読者ごとに別のニュースを流すものだから、混乱は当然ともいえるが、それにしてもみんな、忙しすぎる。次のニュースに取りかかったときには、前のニュースのことはもうすでに忘れている。
オンラインの情報は、バージョンによって違う。前の情報は次々に書き換えられる。情報は付け加えられ、修正され、消される。同一の発信元がいくつもの URL から違った情報を流す。どれが正しいというわけではない。ただただ発信される。
「情報は消費される」と言ったのは誰だったろう。急に調べたくなった。