1. (U) Summary. The selection of the thirty-one members of the Peacebuilding Commission (PBC) Organizational Committee remains stalled over the regional breakdown of the ECOSOC seats (reftel). USUN, however, has managed to facilitate a rotational agreement among the top ten financial contributors regarding their representation on the PBC over the first two-terms, which allows for participation by each of the top contributors. The agreement will allow the financial contributors to name their representatives as soon as ECOSOC acts, in accordance with the process spelled out in the resolutions.
2. (C) The donors’ discussions were not without controversy as Germany, in particular, demanded a longer-term rotational scheme to ensure that Japan would not become a de facto permanent member of the PBC (a proposal the Japanese termed “insulting”). In the end, the leading contributors were able to agree on a rotation for the first four years while agreeing that the German proposal would serve as “an indicative template” beyond that. As is common in New York, the agreed language masks an underlying unresolved difference of opinion. End Summary.
Cable: 06USUNNEWYORK457_a
Public Library of US Diplomacy
WikiLeaks
http://www.wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/06USUNNEWYORK457_a.html
C O N F I D E N T I A L USUN NEW YORK 000457
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/09/2011
TAGS: PREL, EAID, KPKO, KUNR, UNSC, UNGA
SUBJECT: UN REFORM/PEACEBUILDING COMMISSION: FINANCIAL
CONTRIBUTORS AGREE, BUT PBC REMAINS STUCK ON MEMBERSHIP
ISSUES
REF: USUN 326
Classified By: Ambassador Alex Wolff, Deputy Permanent Representative,
for reasons 1.4 b,d.
1. (U) Summary. The selection of the thirty-one members of
the Peacebuilding Commission (PBC) Organizational Committee
remains stalled over the regional breakdown of the ECOSOC
seats (reftel). USUN, however, has managed to facilitate a
rotational agreement among the top ten financial contributors
regarding their representation on the PBC over the first
two-terms, which allows for participation by each of the top
contributors. The agreement will allow the financial
contributors to name their representatives as soon as ECOSOC
acts, in accordance with the process spelled out in the
resolutions.
2. (C) The donors' discussions were not without controversy
as Germany, in particular, demanded a longer-term rotational
scheme to ensure that Japan would not become a de facto
permanent member of the PBC (a proposal the Japanese termed
"insulting"). In the end, the leading contributors were able
to agree on a rotation for the first four years while
agreeing that the German proposal would serve as "an
indicative template" beyond that. As is common in New York,
the agreed language masks an underlying unresolved difference
of opinion. End Summary.
Identifying the big donors
--------------------------
3. (U) The UNGA and UNSC resolutions to operationalize the
PBC determined that five top providers of assessed and
voluntary contributions to the UN system "selected by and
among the ten top providers" shall be members of the PBC
Organizational Committee. The UN Secretariat was asked to
produce the list of top contributors, based on a rolling
three-year average of contributions to all UN funds, programs
and agencies. The list was immediately controversial. A/SYG
Bob Orr, in presenting the first draft to member states,
noted that there was no agreed upon UN system-wide financial
reporting that allowed for the easy collection of data.
Countries lower on the initial list (e.g., Italy) complained
that important UN agencies had been omitted. EU countries
complained that their share of contributions made to the UN
system through Brussels were not reflected.
4. (U) The final list included a more complete accounting of
UN contributions and was accepted as definitive for the
purposes of this year's PBC selection process. It also
illustrated the disparity in UN contributions. Over three
years, the U.S. provided a total of nearly 11.5 billion
dollars to the UN system; Japan nearly 5.5 billion dollars;
and the UK nearly 3.5 billion. The Germans were next on the
list at 2.4 billion dollars over three years. Netherlands,
Italy, Norway, France, Sweden and Canada (at 1.6 billion)
rounded out the top ten. Though not listed, we understand
that Denmark is in the eleventh position, but with a
substantial gap between its contributions and those of Canada.
Arguing among friends
---------------------
5. (U) Already on the PBC via the Security Council (along
with the UK and France), USUN agreed to facilitate the
decision among the ten donors on the process of selecting the
five representatives. There was quick agreement within the
group that the top five donors not already on the PBC would
serve for the first two-year term. With five seats to divide
among seven countries, there was also agreement that each of
the top contributors should be given an opportunity to serve
on the PBC within the first two terms (four years). The
difficulty came in determining whether or not - and then how
- to address rotation beyond those four years.
6. (C) Among the Europeans, particularly the Italians and
Dutch, there was a desire to prevent Germany from setting
itself apart from the rest of the Europeans. The Germans, in
turn, would not agree to a rotation scheme that included them
but not the Japanese (rumored to reflect German unhappiness
with Japan's failure to remain with the G-4 on Security
Council expansion). The Japanese, seeing their contribution
as significantly higher than any of the other seven, took
offense at the suggestion that they should agree now to come
off the PBC in 2011. (Japanese DPR Ozawa told the assembled
group of ten that Japan considered it an "insulting"
proposal.) Canada and Norway were unhappy that the EU
countries had quickly sought to establish a group negotiation
position.
7. (U) Ambassador Wolff, over a period of weeks, emphasized
the importance of avoiding a protracted negotiation among the
leading donors that could cause a delay in the establishment
of the PBC. He successfully secured agreement from the ten
on the immediate issue of representation (the top five for
2006-2007, with Sweden and Canada to join the top three for
2008-2009). The contributors also agreed that the
German-proposed longer-term rotation would serve as "an
indicative template" for future years, but would be reviewed
by the group prior to the third term.
Reassuring the Japanese
-----------------------
8. (C) In practice, the vague language relating to the German
scheme will have little effect four years from now, when the
issue will be re-opened by the donors. We should expect
another political negotiation, reflecting the rivalries of
that time. The Japanese delegation in New York appears to
understand this, but remains deeply upset that the Europeans
"ganged up" on the one Asian country among the top
contributors. Our Japanese contacts also report serious
concern in Tokyo that the language of the agreement might be
used to force them off the PBC in the future. We do not
believe that to be the case. As long as Japan's
contributions remain so significantly higher than all the
others campaigning for a seat, we believe they should have
the political capital here in New York to maintain their
participation in the PBC for as long as they like.
BOLTON