Thorin Klosowski

The best productivity tricks used by evil dictators

  • Force difficult decisions on people when their willpower is weak
  • Create a “five-year plan” for personal goals
  • Purge threats to your power
  • Embrace your “cult of personality”
  • Give direct, powerful speeches
  • Learn from experiences, not books

2 thoughts on “Thorin Klosowski

  1. shinichi Post author

    The Best Productivity Tricks Used By Evil Dictators

    by Thorin Klosowski

    History is full of evil dictators, and while the had their share of bad qualities, it’s undeniable they were efficient at getting things done. Here’s what we can learn from them, despite their evil nature

    Dictators manipulate people when their willpower is weak, they get rid of close friends, and they give rousing speeches that can convince people to do just about anything. Here’s six things, both good and evil, we can learn from the ways dictators have handled situations

    Force Difficult Decisions on People When Their Willpower is Weak

    As we’ve talked about before, working when you’re tired and when you’re suffering from decision fatigue leads to poor decision making. A good dictator knows exactly how to exploit this

    Cuban dictator Fidel Castro loved 4 a.m. meetings where he’d often get people out of bed so he could put them at a distinct disadvantage. Russian dictator Joseph Stalin would also use this tactic, even meeting Winston Churchill late at night to draw up plans to attack Germany

    How you can use this: In both of these cases, the idea is to catch your enemies (or allies) when their willpower is low and they’re willing to do anything to work with you. On the flipside of this, it’s a reminder that decision fatigue is real and easily exploitable by anyone for a variety of means—so whenever possible, avoid those 4am meetings with your boss (or give yourself enough time to wake up beforehand). Photo by Garry Knight

    Create a “Five-Year Plan” for Personal Goals

    Popularized by Joseph Stalin, the Five-Year Plan was an economic plan that sought to bring about a specific end goal like industrialization, lower unemployment, and general readiness for possible problems. On top of being embraced in Soviet Russia, the idea of a Five-Year Plan was used in The People’s Republic of China, Cuba, Pakistan, Vietnam, and others

    How you can use this: While your five-year plan will likely be less ambitious than most dictator’s, the idea itself is still a solid one. In fact, we’ve talked about making a five-year financial plan before, and “where do you see yourself in five years?” is a popular interview question you should have a response to

    To figure out what you want, and how to work towards those goals, financial blog The Simple Dollar recommends you create a Five-Year Sketch:

    Here are some elements to think about when making this sketch:
    What will your job be like?
    What will your family be like?
    What will your physical appearance be like?
    What will your home be like?
    What will a typical day be like?
    What will you be looking forward to?
    What will your social circle look like?
    I encourage you to try to write down at least ten traits for each of these questions that describe the way you’d like your life to be in five years

    Planning ahead five years is a great way to figure out what you want, and how you want to get it. We’ve shown you how to prioritize those goals with a hierarchy, how to fight back when your brain stops you from achieving goals, and even how working towards your goals in public can help. Photo by Pascal

    Purge Threats to Your Power

    In order to hold onto power, a dictator often needs to get rid of threats. This means purging your closest friends and advisors when they get too close to you or you feel like they want your power. The threat alone makes those outside the circle vie for power and attention, while the inner circle is stuck sucking up to you

    Nearly every dictator uses this tactic to some extent, but Fidel Castro and Peru’s Alberto Fujimoro were especially good at it. As Steven Levitsky points out in the Journal of Democracy, Fujimori is most famous for his self-coup in 1992 where he closed Congress, suspended the constitution and got rid of the judiciary so that he could take control

    In their book The Dictator’s Handbook: Why Bad Behavior is Almost Always Good Politics, authors Bruce Bueno de Mesquita and Alastair Smith outline this idea as “Rule 1: Keep your winning coalition as small as possible.”

    Fidel Castro was legendary at this. After the revolution in Cuba was a success, 12 of his 20 ministers had resigned (or were ousted). This included Castro’s fellow revolutionary Che Guevara. Castro sent Guevera to Bolivia for a mission in 1967, then cut his funding and left him stranded there because Castro saw Guevera as a threat

    How you can use this: If someone is challenging your authority, the easiest way to deal with it is to get rid of the person in question. Be careful and keep an eye out for anyone gunning for your position. On the flipside, if you’re looking to move up in the ranks, you’ll either want to be extra nice to the person who’s job you’re gunning for, so they don’t feel threatened. Alternatively, you could try to get rid of them before they get rid of you, but that’s much riskier (and not as nice). Photo by Cory Doctorow

    Embrace Your “Cult of Personality”

    The cult of personality is a well-known dictator trick. The idea is to present yourself as the most amazing thing possible. To do this, dictators would pick up ridiculous habits, plaster their photos all over the country, or even give themselves nicknames

    The most prominent (and possibly over-the-top) example of was North Korea’s Kim Jong-il, aka, the Supreme Leader of North Korea. Jong-il’s cult of personality rose to the point where, according to author’s Chol-hwan Kang and Pierre Rigoulot in the their book, The Aquariums of Pyongyang: Ten Years in the North Korean Gulag, people actually believed that Jong-il could control the weather with his outfits

    This is common practice amongst dictators. Romanian communist dictator Nicolae Ceaușescu gave himself the title, “The Genius of the Carpathians,” Italy’s Benito Mussollini made himself look taller by only allowing pictures from certain angles, Libya’s Muammar Gaddafi only employed female bodyguards known as the “Amazonian Guard”, and Cambodia’s Pol Pot rarely allowed pictures of himself at all

    How you can use this: Your own cult of personality isn’t likely to get as extensive as a dictator’s, but the idea that you can embrace and control it is important for things like job searches. As we’ve mentioned before, shameless self-promotion during interviews isn’t a bad thing. More important is establishing and maintaining your online identity, which is essentially the non-dictator version of the “cult of personality.” If you control what others see, you can control their perception of you, and come off looking a lot better than you are in real life.

    Give Direct, Powerful Speeches

    By a lot of accounts, Germany’s Adolf Hitler was one of the best public speakers in dictator history. At least part of that was due to his timing. Before Hitler started to take power, public speaking was often an intellectual thing, filled with complex, lecture-like readings. Hitler’s performance, in contrast, was excited, emotive, and filled with slogans. In Richard J Evan’s The Coming of the Third Reich, he describes Hitler’s public speaking like so:

    [Hitler] gained much of his oratorical success by telling his audiences what they wanted to hear. He used simple, straightforward language that ordinary people could understand, short sentences, powerful, emotive slogans. Often beginning a speech quietly, to capture his audience’s attention, he would gradually build to a climax, his deep, rather hoarse voice would rise in pitch, climbing in a crescendo to a ranting and screaming finale, accompanied by carefully rehearsed dramatic gestures…as he worked his audience into a frenzy emotion. There were no qualifications in what he said; everything was absolute, uncompromising, irrevocable, undeviating, unalterable, final…he exuded self-confidence, aggression, belief in the ultimate triumph of his party, even a sense of destiny.

    Of course, Hitler’s speeches were all about rhetoric and absolution. While the content itself was horrible, he was undeniably good at getting people to agree with him—even when he was openly calling them stupid. Bruce Loebs, from the Department of Communication and Rhetorical Studies at Idaho State University points out that Hitler used a few tricks to get people on his side. These included arguments that used passion over reason, black and white reasoning as propaganda, and of course, repetition.

    How you can use this: In some ways, Hitler’s speeches were similar to what we talked about when we showed you how to plant ideas into someone’s mind, but Hitler was far more over the top. Still, a lot can be learned from his speech style. Hitler was an obsessive editor of his speeches, and he consistently delivered them in plain language that everyone could understand. Keep this in mind when giving a presentation at work, raising office morale after a bad day, or even presenting an argument to a friend. Simplify your speech (as opposed to trying to sound smart), put some emotion into it, build up slowly, and you’ll have your audience eating out your hands.

    Learn From Experiences, Not Books

    The strongest and longest lasting dictators embraced the idea of “practice makes perfect”, and put themselves on the front lines at some point in order to gain experience. Julius Caesar, for instance, fought on the front lines with soldiers, slept in the same beds, and learned from them before coming up with the quote, “Experience is the teacher of all things.”

    Napoleon Bonaparte, of course, did the same thing as he worked his way through the French Revolution (before eventually installing himself as a dictator). Vladimir Lenin was extremely well read, but still spent his time practicing his craft, writing pamphlets, and talking with his people. Mao took this a step further and used his peasant upbringing not just as an excuse not to shower, but also as fuel for his control over peasents.

    How you can use this: The point is that experience is far more necessary to get a job done well than a bunch of reading material. New experiences are important, and with deliberate practice you’ll eventually be the best you can be.

    As we know, practical experience is often better than grades or books in the job market. Internships are more valuable than grades, because when you have experience—but no direct qualifications, you’re a better candidate for the job. Heck, even when we hire here at Lifehacker, having a personal blog of writing samples is far more useful than previous, irrelevant job experience. If you don’t have those types of experiences, make the experience yourself.

  2. shinichi Post author


    by Thorin Klosowski

    translated by 伊藤貴之










    ファイナンス関連ブログ「The Simple Dollar」によると、自分が望むもの、またその実現方法を知るためには「5年後のスケッチ」を作成するとよいそうです。


    • どのような仕事をしていたいですか?
    • どのような家庭を持っていたいですか?
    • どのような見た目になっていたいですか?
    • どのような家に住んでいたいですか?
    • どのような一日を過ごしていたいですか?
    • そのころは何を楽しみにしていますか?
    • 交際範囲はどのようになっていますか?




    ほぼすべての独裁者がこの戦術を用います。特にフィデル・カストロやペルーのアルベルト・フジモリの例に顕著です。米誌『Journal of Democracy』(PDF)でSteven Levitsky氏が示したように、フジモリ氏は1992年に憲法を停止し、議会を解散、さらに裁判所を閉鎖するという自己クーデターを実行しました。自らの権力を強化するためにです。

    Bruce Bueno de Mesquita氏とAlastair Smith氏は共著『The Dictator’s Handbook(独裁者ハンドブック)』の中で、このアイデアを「ルール1:勝者連合はできるだけ少人数にすること」と書いています。フィデル・カストロも伝説になるほどこの戦術に長けていました。キューバ革命が成功した後、12~20人もの大臣たちが辞職させられました(もしくは追放)。




    もっとも顕著な例は、北朝鮮の偉大なるリーダーこと金正日です。金正日の個人崇拝がどこまでの高みに達したかについては、カン・チョルファン氏と ピエール・リグロ氏の共著『平壌の水族館:北朝鮮強制収容所で送った10年』に詳しいです。北朝鮮の人民は、金正日が天気さえも変えられると信じていたそうです。




    ドイツのアドルフ・ヒトラーは歴代の独裁者の中でも並外れた演説の名手でした。ヒトラーが登場する前は、演説といえば知的で複雑な講義のような形式が主流でした。一方、ヒトラーのパフォーマンスは、高揚感があり、感情に訴え、スローガンを多用したものでした。リチャード・J・エヴァンス氏は著書『The Coming of the Third Reich(第三帝国の到来)』の中で、ヒトラーの演説を次のように表現しています。


    ヒトラーの演説はレトリックにあふれています。内容は時に劣悪で、聴衆を無能呼ばわりすることさえありましたが、人々を納得させることには間違いなく長けていました。米・アイダホ州立大学でコミュニケーション学と修辞学を教えるBruce Loebs氏によると、ヒトラーは大衆を味方につけるためにプロパガンダの常套手段を使ったそうです。論理より感情に訴え、物事を全て白か黒かの二者択一に限定する「二分法」を用い、意図的な繰り返しを行いました。








Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *