Uichol Kim, Harry C. Triandis, Cigdem Kagitcibasi, Sang-Chin Choi, Gene Yoon

… in East Asian societies, Confucianism has provided a moral and philosophical basis for self-construal and social order. … collectivist societies that support the basic tenets of Confucianism prioritize the common good and social harmony over individual interests. All individuals are assumed to be linked in a web of interrelatedness. Individuals are conceived to be embedded and situated in particular roles and status. They are bound by relationships that emphasize common fate. Individuals are bound by relationships, which emphasize a common fate. Individuals are encouraged to put other people’s and the group’s interests before their own. From a societal point of view, duties and obligations are prescribed by roles, and individuals lose “face” if they fail to fulfill these duties and obligations. Concession and compromise are essential ingredients in promoting role-based and virtue-based conceptions of justice. Social order is maintained when everyone fulfills his or her roles and duties. Institutions are seen as an extension of the family, and paternalism and legal moralism (i.e., moral values institutionalized in legal codes) reign supreme. In order to promote the collective welfare and social harmony, individuals are encouraged to suppress any individualist and hedonistic desires. As a result, interdependency, succour, nurturance, common fate, and compliance are important aspects of East Asian collectivism.

2 thoughts on “Uichol Kim, Harry C. Triandis, Cigdem Kagitcibasi, Sang-Chin Choi, Gene Yoon

  1. shinichi Post author

    Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, Method, and Applications (Cross Cultural Research and Methodology)

    by Uichol Kim (Editor), Harry C. Triandis (Editor), Cigdem Kagitcibasi (Editor), Sang-Chin Choi (Editor), Gene Yoon (Editor)

    Reply
  2. shinichi Post author

    東アジアの集団主義(collectivism)の社会では、個人よりも集団に価値を置き、個人でよりも集団で行動することが多い。  

    ヨーロッパの個人主義(individualism)の社会では、集団よりも個人に価値を置くことこそが自由主義(liberalism)の基本であり、集団よりも個人を尊重することこそが人権(human rights)の原点であり、集団ではなく個人間の比較をもって平等(equality)を語る。

    東アジアでは、平等は仏教の考え方であり、物事のあり方が真理の立場から見ればすべて同一であることをいうのに対し、ヨーロッパでは、平等はイズム(egalitarianism)であり、個人が法的・政治的・経済的・社会的に公平・同等に扱われることをいう。

    ヨーロッパの個人主義の観点からすれば、東アジアの集団主義は権威主義(authoritarianism)や全体主義(totalitarianism)にしか見えない。

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *