Bruno Latour

While we spent years trying to detect the real prejudices hidden behind the appearance of objective statements, do we now have to reveal the real objective and incontrovertible facts hidden behind the illusion of prejudices? And yet entire Ph.D. programs are still running to make sure that good American kids are learning the hard way that facts are made up, that there is no such thing as natural, unmediated, unbiased access to truth, that we are always prisoners of language, that we always speak from a particular standpoint, and so on, while dangerous extremists are using the very same argument of social construction to destroy hard-won evidence that could save our lives. Was I wrong to participate in the invention of this field known as science studies? Is it enough to say that we did not really mean what we said? Why does it burn my tongue to say that global warming is a fact whether you like it or not? Why can’t I simply say that the argument is closed for good?

Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern (PDF fike)

This entry was posted in knowledge. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Bruno Latour

  1. shinichi says:

    Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern

    by Bruno Latour

    http://www.bruno-latour.fr/sites/default/files/89-CRITICAL-INQUIRY-GB.pdf

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.